The Eugenic Architects of Modernity
Eugenics principles are the driving force for The Great Reset and global push towards transhumanism.
“History began when humans invented gods, and will end when humans become gods.”
-Yuval Noah Harari
The transhumanist agenda was front and center this past week at the 2022 World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos. The unelected architects of humanity outlined their plans to interlink mankind with technology by the year 2030, setting the stage for the continued advancement of global technocracy and desecration of individual liberties.
The World Economic Forum describes the central premise of transhumanism as “the notion that biological evolution will eventually be overtaken by advances in genetic, wearable and implantable technologies that artificially expedite the evolutionary process.” Transhumanists are rooted in the belief that mankind will bypass the laws of nature and instead be enhanced by bioengineering, artificial intelligence, and molecular nanotechnology.
With governments around the world backing this agenda, and the looming potentiality of technocratic totalitarianism, the clear ethical dilemma of transhumanism can be summed up in two simple questions:
Who decided that the transhumanist path is the destined path of mankind, superseding individual choice?
What happens to individuals who choose not to participate?
Yuval Noah Harrari, lead advisor to WEF Founder Klaus Schwab, can be seen below talking about a dilemma of the transhumanist agenda: “The biggest question..what to do with all these USELESS people.”
The transhumanism agenda, with the World Economic Forum leading the charge, is rooted in a Social Darwinist philosophy that mankind has the ability to self-direct their own evolution, bypassing the laws of nature. This is the same philosophy rooted at the core of the deadliest totalitarian regimes during the 20th century: eugenics.
A Brief History of Eugenics
Francis Galton, cousin to Charles Darwin, first coined the term “eugenics” from the Greek work eugenes, meaning “good in birth,” in his 1883 book “Inquiries into Human Fertility and its Development.”
“We greatly want a brief word to express the science of improving stock, which is by no means confined to questions of judicious mating, but which, especially in the case of man, takes cognizance of all influences that tend in however remote a degree to give to the more suitable races or strains of blood a better chance of prevailing speedily over the less suitable than they otherwise would have had. The word eugenics would sufficiently express the idea.”
Galton believed that eugenics could control the course of human evolution. He claimed only the “higher races” gifted with admirable heredity traits would be successful, and that mankind should strive to make this the foundation of breeding.
In the early 1900s, eugenics societies began popping up globally. Sterilization laws, the mandated sterilization of “idiots” or “imbeciles,” as well as certain classes of criminals, became prevalent in the United States during this time (with many of these laws remaining on the books until the 1980s).
The roots of Galton’s work created an increased acceptance of eugenic ideologies in western culture, which in turn allowed for the emergence of the Nazi Party in the 1930s. Through the Nazis, government endorsed eugenics was put on full display with the forced sterilization, scientific experimentation, and persecution of Jews and other minority groups.
The horrors of the Nazi regime led to eugenics becoming deeply unpopular amongst the public. However, many hold the misconception that the end of the Nazis brought with it the end of eugenic inquiry. To the contrary, the formal end of the Nazi regime was the seed that allowed deeper scientific inquiry into eugenics to covertly spread globally.
Neo-Malthusianism and the Creation of the World Economic Forum
Under the CIA program Operation Paperclip, more than 1,600 Nazi scientists, engineers, and technicians came to the United States. While many who had been previously dedicated to eugenics research attempted to distance themselves from the horrors of Nazi Germany, it was in collaboration with these Nazis scientists that we began seeing an advocacy for neo-Malthusianism, the belief that global population should be reduced to prevent mass starvation and global collapse.
The World Economic Forum, first founded in 1970 by Klaus Schwab, was rooted in this neo-Malthusianism ideology. Klaus Schwab was born in 1938 in Hitler’s Germany. His father, Eugen Schwab, was a high ranking Nazi official and confidant to Adolf Hitler. Eugen was in charge of Escher-Wyss, a strategic enterprise of Nazi Germany, which had its own concentration camp where prisoners were forced to work for free.
Klaus and his younger brother, Urs Reiner Schwab, both followed in their father’s footsteps and trained as machine engineers. In 1967, Klaus became known in public circles, as he had gone to work at Escher-Wyss and played a major role in the company’s fundamental shift from “a machine building company into a technology corporation.”
In 1970, Klaus wrote to the European Commission and asked for help setting up a “non-commercial think tank for European business leaders.” He then left Escher-Wyss, and in 1971, the first meeting of the World Economic Forum – then called the European Management Symposium – convened in Davos, Switzerland.
The most influential group that helped spur the creation of the World Economic Forum was the Club of Rome. The Club was founded in 1968 by Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King during a private meeting at a residence owned by the Rockefeller family in Bellagio, Italy. In their 1972 book entitled “The Limits to Growth,” which largely focused on global overpopulation, they warned that “if the world’s consumption patterns and population growth continued at the same high rates of the time, the earth would strike its limits within a century.”
At the third meeting of the World Economic Forum in 1973, Peccei delivered a speech summarizing the Club of Rome’s book, which the World Economic Forum website remembers as having been the distinguishing event of this historical meeting. That same year, the Club would publish a report detailing an “adaptive” model for global governance that divided the world into ten economic/political regions.
The Club of Rome’s obsession with decreasing global population was long controversial, which critics described as being influenced by eugenics. In the Club’s 1991 Book, The First Global Revolution, it was argued that neo-Malthusianism policies could gain popular support if the masses were able to link them with an existential fight against a common enemy:
“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”
Over the past 50 years since its inception, the World Economic Forum has penetrated the cabinets of numerous governments around the world and secured the backing of the largest corporations, making their sphere of influence large enough to implement this neo-Malthusianism as a global technocratic final solution.
Transhumanism: The Technological Final Solution
What was once science fiction is now a reality. The World Economic Forum acknowledges that transhuman technologies are “already at hand.” The only question now is…
“[will we] take advantage of the advances in nanotechnologies, genetic engineering and other medical sciences to enhance the biological and mental functioning of human beings (and never to go back)?”
The World Economic Forum has taken on the role of God, dictating the direction of humanity by enforcing the idea that our only future is in a merging with machine. Yuval Noah Harari states that “science is replacing evolution by natural selection, with evolution by intelligent design.”
It is our own egoic God complex, the idea that we can supersede the laws of nature through technological innovation, that have brought us to this inevitable point. Our scientific material paradigm has seen us imperialize and pillage the planet for the last century, leaving us disconnected from our own true nature and ripe for exploitation by institutions such as the World Economic Forum.
“The goal of a dictatorship is to control everyone, everywhere on the planet, ruthlessly and without exception. That's why the new technology being introduced everywhere is a technology for the control of the people.” - Serge Monast, 1994
Mankind has been programmed to forget its biorelativity, the knowing of the inner laws of man being no different than the outer laws of nature. Transhumanism represents the irreversible disconnect from our spiritual consciousness; the gift that allows us to perceive, create, and hold reverence for beauty. What will be left is a world of mass conformity, a population that knows nothing but to bow down to the ruthlessness of a global technocratic dictatorship. The people will own nothing, eat genetically engineered food, be stuck living in Smartcities completely disconnected from nature, and ultimately have no ability to recognize their own individual divinity as they work away towards innovations that only serve the ruling elite technocrats.
There are no legislative solutions to the Transhumanist ideologies. It is the center of all our technological innovations, while global governance is in the works for every political system in the world, spearheaded by groups such as the United Nations, World Economic Forum, and World Health Organization. The idea we need a centralized solution, where problems are tackled on a collective scale, is part of the beast system that has left us prone to the situation we find ourselves in. We have been trained to outsource our sovereignty to centralized structures. We rely on global food supply chains and multinational corporations for the basics of survival, leaving us with no individual ability to fend for ourselves or survive in harmony with nature.
We have created the ultimate technocratic nanny state through our unwillingness to govern our own lives. The only solution is to remember that this movement is being done with your own acquiescence. You are the one choosing to use “Smart” technology, support multinational corporations, eat genetically engineered foods, and ultimately take power out of the hands of your own community through your decision making. We have done this to ourselves and it’s time to take full ownership of that fact.
The Great Reset, a global technocratic slave state, does not have to be our destiny. The solution begins in how you choose to rewrite your personal narrative. You are not a “useless eater” as Harari describes. You are not a “cancer” to the Earth. You are not any of the labels our institutions place on you.
You are whole. You are love. You are enough. This is the truth.
It is only from rewriting your own story that you will be able to rewrite the story of mankind. Reconnect with you who you are on a deeper level. Who are you beyond the divisive ideologies and identity labels? What is your true purpose, the reason you have chose to be here in this moment? What exists for you when you finally choose to sacrifice the “comforts” that make this global system possible?
When all else fails you, when hope feels lost, let yourself be guided by one simple question: What would love do now?
It will likely get darker before we see true change. As long as stars still glimmer in the sky above, there will always be a reason to have hope. It’s never too late to lock hands as one and create the harmonious way our hearts know is possible.
I pray we choose the alternative path… the path of love, beauty, and a true recognition of our sacred nature.
But it’s up to you. Where you go, we all go.
So, what’s it going to be?
Work With Me | The Fifth Dimension Podcast | Donate to my work